Pre-Planning or Pre-Exhaustion? It's Time to Rethink How We Prepare Teachers
- Anjanette Farrar
- Jul 28
- 4 min read

The First Day Should Not Feel Like the Last
Every August, schools come alive again.
Hallways are polished. Bulletin boards go up. Class lists are finalized. Teachers return with fresh ideas, renewed optimism, and hope for a great school year.
Recently, I had the opportunity to visit a former school where I once supported teachers. It was wonderful to reconnect with familiar faces, but something caught my attention almost immediately.
It was only the first day of pre-planning.
The students had not even arrived.
Yet many of the teachers already looked exhausted.
That left me asking a simple question.
What is the real purpose of pre-planning?
Pre-planning should prepare teachers for students.
Too often, it feels like we are preparing teachers for meetings.
Purpose Over Procedure
Before anyone misunderstands my point, there are absolutely trainings that every school must conduct each year. School safety procedures, legal requirements, district initiatives, compliance expectations, and certification requirements all serve an important purpose. Some of these trainings are mandated, and they should be.
But once those non-negotiables have been addressed, we have an opportunity to ask a different question.
Are we making the best use of our teachers' time?
Veteran teachers who have returned to the same school year after year already understand many of the systems, expectations, and routines. They know arrival procedures. They know dismissal procedures. They understand the culture of the school. They know the technology platforms. They understand grading expectations. They have lived the routines that help the school function every day.
So why are they spending hours reviewing the exact same information every single year?
A Different Approach
Years ago, I worked with a school leadership team that approached this challenge differently.
Instead of requiring every returning teacher to sit through every training, we developed internal online learning modules. Teachers completed the modules independently and demonstrated their understanding through short assessments.
If they successfully demonstrated mastery by meeting the established benchmark, they were exempt from attending the face-to-face session.
If they did not meet the benchmark, they attended the training.
There was no debate because the expectations were clear.
It was never about giving teachers a free pass.
It was about respecting their professionalism while still ensuring accountability.
Everyone met the expectation.
Everyone demonstrated understanding.
Instructional quality was never compromised.
What changed was how teachers experienced pre-planning.
Time Is One of Our Greatest Resources
As our educational landscape continues to evolve, so should the way we think about professional learning. Students are changing. Teacher populations are changing. School systems are changing. If we expect innovation in classrooms, we should also expect innovation in how we prepare educators before students ever walk through the doors.
Imagine what schools could accomplish if that same philosophy expanded beyond compliance.
Instead of filling every available minute with meetings, schools could intentionally create time for the work that actually prepares teachers for students:
Time to organize classrooms.
Time to unpack materials.
Time to collaborate with grade-level teams.
Time to review student data.
Time to strengthen lesson plans.
Time to prepare engaging learning experiences for the first weeks of school.
Time to make copies without standing in line behind twenty other teachers trying to accomplish the exact same task.
Time to breathe.
Rethinking Long-Standing Practices
Another practice worth reconsidering is the annual tradition of moving returning teachers into different classrooms.
Unless there is a compelling reason, what educational purpose does it actually serve?
Every classroom move steals valuable preparation time. Teachers spend hours packing, unpacking, reorganizing, relabeling, reconnecting technology, rebuilding learning spaces, and relocating instructional materials instead of preparing instruction.
Those are hours that could have been spent planning meaningful learning experiences for students.
Supporting New Teachers Without Slowing Veteran Teachers
New teachers are a different conversation.
They absolutely deserve intentional onboarding.
They need time to learn the school's culture, procedures, expectations, technology systems, curriculum, and community before students arrive.
In fact, I believe new teacher orientation should happen separately from much of the veteran staff's pre-planning experience. Giving new teachers an additional day or two before returning staff allows them to receive the support they need while allowing experienced teachers to spend their time preparing for instruction instead of repeating information they already know.
Trust the Professionals
Returning to the same school should come with some advantages.
Experience should matter.
Professional trust should matter.
Time should matter.
One of the greatest signs of respect a leader can show is trusting professionals to use their time wisely.
Teachers should not begin the school year already feeling overwhelmed.
They should not feel obligated to arrive early or stay late simply to finish preparing their classrooms because every available minute during pre-planning was consumed by meetings. Most schools do not compensate teachers for those additional hours, yet many educators quietly give them anyway because they want to be ready for their students.
That should not be the expectation.
A Better Way Forward
If teachers are already burned out before the first student walks through the door, we have to ask ourselves whether our current approach is accomplishing its intended purpose.
pre-planning should leave teachers feeling prepared.
Not depleted.
When teachers have the time to thoughtfully prepare their classrooms, organize meaningful instruction, collaborate with colleagues, and enter the school year with confidence instead of exhaustion, everyone benefits.
Most importantly, students benefit.
Perhaps the question is not whether we need pre-planning.
The question is whether we have the courage to redesign it.
What would change in your school if pre-planning focused less on filling calendars and more on preparing teachers?



Comments